4 ms·
I think that it’s quite responsible not to speculate on something they’re not an expert on. It’s exactly the sort of news bite that catastrophists glom onto.
by greggsy 6mo ago
I think that it’s quite responsible not to speculate on something they’re not an expert on.
It’s exactly the sort of news bite that catastrophists glom onto.
This is responsible journalism.
- anigbrowl 6mo agoThey could just call a geologist and ask, or cite some published works on the topic. It's not responsible, it's lazy.
- icegreentea2 6mo agoThis is a phys.org "article". They're usually just rehashed press releases, and this one is particularly bad - it's literally just the NASA press release with the last 2 paragraphs chopped off. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/nisar/us-indian-space-mission-maps-extreme-subsidence-in-mexico-city/ https://www.nasa.gov/missions/nisar/us-indian-space-mission-...
- PunchyHamster 6mo ago> I think that it’s quite responsible not to speculate on something they’re not an expert on. "Recent satellite maps show Mexico City getting closer to hell at alarming rate"