The Utah statute defines it as: > (a) any material that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, taking the material as a who

The Utah statute defines it as: > (a) any material that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, taking the material as a whole and with respect to minors, is designed to appeal to, or is designed to pander to, the prurient interest; > (b) material that exploits, is devoted to, or principally consists of descriptions of actual, simulated, or animated display or depiction of any of the following, in a manner patently offensive with respect to minors: > (i) pubic hair, anus, vulva, genitals, or nipple of the female breast; > (ii) touching, caressing, or fondling of nipples, breasts, buttocks, anuses, or genitals; or > (iii) sexual intercourse, mastu rbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation, excretory functions, exhibitions, or any other sexual act; and > (c) the material taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. Sounds reasonable enough, wouldn't you say? I hope you would agree that children shouldn't be browsing these websites.