3 ms·
Who cares? It’s their content. If they hired an editor to help them, cool. If the content doesn’t suit you, move on. But the incessant “AI was used here, thus
by swaits 5mo ago
Who cares? It’s their content. If they hired an editor to help them, cool. If the content doesn’t suit you, move on.
But the incessant “AI was used here, thus is it garbage” is long past time to enter the grave.
- geir_isene 5mo ago^^ some anti-luddism right there
- wiseowise 5mo agoLuddism is when you don't bother reading what someone didn't bother to write.
- geir_isene 5mo agoDictionaries on the second row down that aisle.
- jgilias 5mo agoI agree, yeah
- gbgarbeb 5mo ago[flagged]
- nullsanity 5mo ago[dead]
- nananana9 5mo agoMany people care, with good reason. We learned to notice LLM-isms is because they are, in fact, a very strong predictor that a piece of text is in fact garbage that's not worth your time reading. I usually stop reading at the first LLM-ism, but I found the premise of this post interesting enough to keep going - and guess what, the entire article was literally just "I prompt CC to make software tailored for me" blown out to 8 sections.
- wiseowise 5mo ago> Who cares? The parent comment does. Why do you care that they care?
- boomlinde 5mo agoThat no one cared enough to write it is usually a good indication that I should not care to read it either.
- lionkor 5mo ago> Who cares? I care, because it landed on the front-page of a website that I thought was about engineering and hacking, not prompting a no-code tool and spending 400 bucks on it, to get something nobody else wants.
- lpcvoid 5mo ago>But the incessant “AI was used here, thus is it garbage” is long past time to enter the grave. Nah, that rule is more relevant and true now than it was a year ago.