3 ms·
You're pushing back on something YOU said, not me. I never called it a "free" layer of security, I said it was ONE layer of security. Emphasizing the one, beca
by INTPenis 5mo ago
You're pushing back on something YOU said, not me.
I never called it a "free" layer of security, I said it was ONE layer of security. Emphasizing the one, because security comes in as many layers as one is able to manage.
- Latty 5mo agoWell, my issue is that "one layer" implies you can just stack it on others, especially if you say "as many layers as one is able to manage", it implies the best option is to add obscurity on top. As my comment made the case: it's not a simple addition, it's a trade-off, and I'm saying it should be thought about in those terms. I didn't find that was evident from what you said, I guess the "push back" framing was more negative than I intended.
- INTPenis 5mo agoI think you're overthinking this. You're probably imagining some context to this that I'm not understanding fully.
- naniwaduni 5mo agoWhich of your security layers isn't a trade-off?