In original Dawkins article he is talking about Turning test. But Turning test is for intelligence, not consciousness. So that's a stupid mistake. In this arti

In original Dawkins article he is talking about Turning test. But Turning test is for intelligence, not consciousness. So that's a stupid mistake. In this article the author denies derivation: "can reproduce sonnet means conscious" (author never argues against this premise) and "Claude can reproduce sonnet statistically" (undeniable) follows "Claude is conscious" based on "statistically". This is dumb as fuck. If I "drove to London quickly" the fact that I "did it quickly" does not mean I did not drive to London. Quickly is just an implementation detail here.