2 ms·
> perpendicularly misaligned Um. Perpendicular lines intersect at some point. Parallel lines never touch, maybe that’s a better geometric analogy. Of course,
by loloquwowndueo 6mo ago
> perpendicularly misaligned
Um. Perpendicular lines intersect at some point.
Parallel lines never touch, maybe that’s a better geometric analogy.
Of course, for most people things that are “parallel” would seem to be in close agreement.
- ninjagoo 6mo ago> Parallel lines never touch, maybe that’s a better geometric analogy. I do believe the OP meant to say that the incentives are orthogonal (i.e., misaligned, or 90deg to each other), and perpendicularly misaligned is a close fit. Not sure why folks felt you should be downvoted for an heartfelt comment, an explanation is a much better feedback. Downvotes are counterproductive, IMO, if you're trying to have a debate or come to a meeting of minds, so I almost never use them anymore, except for where I detect ill-intentions.
- sigseg1v 6mo ago> Um. Perpendicular lines intersect at some point. Unless you are trying to screw your loyal users in 3 or more dimensions which seems to be the case here
- loloquwowndueo 6mo agoRight - sorry, my pattern suggests 2-dimensional thinking.
- ninjagoo 6mo ago> Unless you are trying to screw your loyal users in 3 or more dimensions which seems to be the case here That made me chuckle ... good one