3 ms·
The answer that seems to be emerging from several different lines of research is that a) they always had fairly low fertility and b) they didn't really go extin
by jbotz 5mo ago
The answer that seems to be emerging from several different lines of research is that a) they always had fairly low fertility and b) they didn't really go extinct as such, they just intermixed with Homo Sapiens Sapiens and because the later had much higher fertility, Neanderthal genes got diluted down to the present ~2% in the Eurasian population.
- askos 5mo agoSounds plausible indeed. Anyways, neanderthals operating a large scale fat production 125 thousand years ago could be a good plot for another hollywood movie scenario. Any takers?
- alanbernstein 5mo agoYou might enjoy Hominids by Robert Sawyer
- user_7832 5mo agoTangentially related, The Man from Earth is really good as well. Very few films choose to shoot on a camcorder, and fewer still pull it off well.
- lanstin 5mo agoI just randomly watched that a month or two ago. A really interesting idea.
- pavel_lishin 5mo agoSeconding this recommendation; the entire trilogy of books is great.
- namenotrequired 5mo agoI thought even after the merge the Neanderthal genes continued to get rarer, indicating natural selection against them
- bonzini 5mo agoIf it's 2% now after 2000-3000 generations, it must have stabilized because any number <.995 is basically zero when raised to the 2000th power. The neanderthal genes would have to be 1-10^-5 as fit as a the sapiens genes, which is basically noise.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]