3 ms·
I think it's the opposite argument IF current AI is conscious, so are trees, rocks, turbulent flows, etc. The argument being that LLMs are so simple that if y
by colechristensen 6mo ago
I think it's the opposite argument
IF current AI is conscious, so are trees, rocks, turbulent flows, etc.
The argument being that LLMs are so simple that if you want to ascribe consciousness to them you have to do the same to a LOT of other stuff.
- digitaltrees 6mo agoBut I listed a specific difference: sensation and response. Trees have that. Rocks do not.
- Izkata 6mo agoI believe you're using the scientific definition of "sentience", while everyone else is using the common understanding of of the word (which should be called "sapience", but thanks to sci-fi's usage of the word "sentience" is largely not).
- digitaltrees 6mo agoI was a philosophy and cognitive science major in undergrad decades ago so I am definitely guilty of using more jargon based concepts than I should