4 ms·
Well, I know Bitwarden is pretty demanding and also not so straightforward to do self-hosting. But we have Vaultwarden which is ridiculously easy to deploy and
by princevegeta89 5mo ago
Well, I know Bitwarden is pretty demanding and also not so straightforward to do self-hosting.
But we have Vaultwarden which is ridiculously easy to deploy and also very lightweight while being immensely popular; has never had any major security incidents so far - and it has thousands of eyes on it for every single commit.
I've been hosting this for three years now and I have never had a single problem with it. always worked with my Bitwarden clients on all of my devices. So if you would like to, try Vaultwarden.
- muppetman 5mo agoYou could have just posted "I didn't read the article" instead of this comment. It specifically addresses vaultwarden quite a number of times.
- prism56 5mo agoNot the original commenter. Just thought I would comment here. I'd be super interested in reading more information in why Bitwarden Lite is inadequate vs vaultwarden.