2 ms·
> Either the software is written to try to follow the law or it isn't Then the real world intervenes. Nobody plans to block an intersection. But a lack of plan
by JumpCrisscross 7mo ago
> Either the software is written to try to follow the law or it isn't
Then the real world intervenes. Nobody plans to block an intersection. But a lack of planning and shits given will put one into that position even without intention.
> it allows these companies to avoid many of these fixes if the tickets are infrequent enough
Sounds fine? Like, as long as AVs and human drivers share the roads, modulating enforcement with infraction frequency seems fine.
- crazygringo 7mo ago> Sounds fine? A major benefit of AV's is that they're supposed to be better than human drivers, not breaking traffic laws just as often.
- JumpCrisscross 7mo ago> major benefit of AV's is that they're supposed to be better than human drivers, not breaking traffic laws just as often If they're infrequently breaking minor traffic laws they may still be doing so (a) less frequently than humans or (b) with less consequence than when humans do it. I say this as someone who tends to drive the speed limit: our traffic laws were not written for perfect parsing.