3 ms·
We need that lawsuit to happen already so we can establish precedent. The person in the driver's seat of the Tesla should be at fault. The engineer using the ll
by sanex 5mo ago
We need that lawsuit to happen already so we can establish precedent. The person in the driver's seat of the Tesla should be at fault. The engineer using the llm should be at fault. The person behind the gun not the manufacturer should be at fault.
- Iolaum 5mo agoWe shouldn't need a lawsuit. The legislative branch should pass a law clarifying those things, that's their job.
- jon_richards 5mo agoThen you need a lawsuit to determine whether the law is “constitutional”.
- hvb2 5mo ago> The person in the driver's seat of the Tesla should be at fault. I don't think this is a good analogy. For Tesla right now it might fly. However, when their software gets to waymo level of autonomy, I would expect liability to shift to the manufacturer. If anything, I think that would be the true proof of a company trusting their software to allow for autonomous driving
- rokob 5mo ago> However, when their software gets to waymo level of autonomy Luckily that won’t happen.
- dotancohen 5mo agoI believe that Mercedes does offer manufacturer liability.
- kelvinjps10 5mo agoAlso especially if they claim they're selling autonomous cars
- missedthecue 5mo agoIn the America, whoever has the most money is liable. It's not worth it for the legal industry otherwise. The lawyer earns his pay by convincing the court that whatever established precedent doesn't apply to his case.
- sanex 5mo agoUnfortunately.