3 ms·
The credit for DeepSeek, in part, goes to US companies such as OpenAI [1] and DeepSeek [2]. Portions of DeepSeek are based on their products. [1] https://www.r
by grassfedgeek 5mo ago
The credit for DeepSeek, in part, goes to US companies such as OpenAI [1] and DeepSeek [2]. Portions of DeepSeek are based on their products.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/china/openai-accuses-deepseek-distilling-us-models-gain-advantage-bloomberg-news-2026-02-12/ https://www.reuters.com/world/china/openai-accuses-deepseek-...
[2] https://x.com/AnthropicAI/status/2025997928242811253 https://x.com/AnthropicAI/status/2025997928242811253
- johnbarron 5mo agoAnd the credit of OpenAI is to Google? https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
- rao-v 5mo agoIs there real evidence that the volume was meaningful for distillation vs say extensive benchmarking and testing? It’s certain all the labs use each others APIs extensively for testing - what’s the actual evidence that Deepseek was at significantly higher scale etc.?
- well_ackshually 5mo agoAw man, I'm going to shed a tear, the poor AI companies that stole books, works of art, writings any anything they could get their grubby hands on while happily telling everyone that their jobs are over by the exabyte are getting their precious little tokens stolen by big evil chinese LLMs :( It's morally right to fuck over Anthropic (and OpenAI, or any other lab). Works generated by AI are not copyrightable anyways, and their terms of service have zero legal value.
- 3eb7988a1663 5mo agoHow immoral of those LLM developers. The rest of the field does such a good job of crediting their inputs.