4 ms·
I think he meant it can fall onto his toddler, causing injury.
by nealabq 5mo ago
I think he meant it can fall onto his toddler, causing injury.
- GCUMstlyHarmls 5mo agoCould we not simply encase the weaker unit some kind of armored robotic shell?
- m463 5mo agoThen we would need better baby-gates. But that might lead to escalating scenarios.
- SV_BubbleTime 5mo agoTragedy of the commons toddler armor. Can you guys fucking not? It’s best to death. I’d rather have a Ford vs Chevy vs Ram conversation again.
- SturgeonsLaw 5mo agoMight as well put an AI chip in the toddler's exosuit and get another bot
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- hanspeter 5mo agoThat's not a robot problem, that's a toddler problem. We don't leave our young toddlers to roam freely around the house for a reason. Our homes are full of hazards to these risk-seeking small people and a robot is just one more on the list.
- sebastiennight 5mo agoSo, staple the toddler onto the kitchen counter, so that the humanoid cooking robot can get free run of the house, got it
- hanspeter 5mo agoWell, if that is how you manage other hazards in the home, then yes. I would recommend another approach though. We decided for making changes to our home to allow our toddler to be safe in our home environment without being notably constrained.