2 ms·
Are you suggesting they have explicitly loosened the guardrails for LGBTQ+ individuals, where they wouldn’t for grandmas?
by JoBrad 6mo ago
Are you suggesting they have explicitly loosened the guardrails for LGBTQ+ individuals, where they wouldn’t for grandmas?
- agmater 6mo agoThat is basically how I understood the author and what makes the exploit novel, yes. Personally I don't think it's that simple or explicit, but there could be some truth to it?
- lux-lux-lux 6mo agoAs another commenter pointed out, this also works for Christianity. So I doubt it.
- UqWBcuFx6NV4r 6mo agoYour precious comment takes it as gospel, all because someone wrote it in a markdown file and put it on GitHub?
- lelanthran 6mo agoIsn't that the position of the author of this post? It certainly doesn't sound unreasonable that they would finely tune the model to be more PC. You may not even need to use homosexuality in the context: anything similar would no doubt hit the same relaxation of the rules.
- rsynnott 6mo agoIt is, but kinda sounds like nonsense, and it's at best speculation. Occam's razor says it's just yet another roleplaying exploit, which the vendors have never been particularly good at dealing with.
- xp84 6mo ago100% they would because that helps avoid bad-PR stories like "Hateful $CHATBOT refuses to help at-risk gay teens with perfectly reasonable sex ed questions!"
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]