> Why? FTA: The 14 cases listed below are almost certainly an undercount. I feel that supports the original comment, considering it's all subjective. Now, yo

> Why? FTA: The 14 cases listed below are almost certainly an undercount. I feel that supports the original comment, considering it's all subjective. Now, you are going to be tempted to start arguing that "almost certainly an undercount" doesn't support the original comment. But remember, it's subjective, and any reasonable person reading that comment and the article could see how "at least" could be seen as doing a lot of work.