3 ms·

On Artifical Analysis it shows only Kimi K2.6 and Mimo V2.5 Pro as better. Those models are 1T parameters total and 30B or 40B active, this might make ablitera

On Artifical Analysis it shows only Kimi K2.6 and Mimo V2.5 Pro as better. Those models are 1T parameters total and 30B or 40B active, this might make abliteration impractical. About Musk, yes, there is correspondence. The only confirmed meeting appears to be a 30 minute visit at Epstein's house together with Musk's wife at the time. As for photos you mention, a quick search tells me there is one photo of Musk and Maxwell at a 2014 Vanity Fair Oscar Party. I find most commentary on here and other platform like Reddit extremely exaggerated compared to what is actually confirmed. Users seem hellbent on linking Musk to pedophilia-related allegations.

2ndorderthought 5mo ago
[flagged]
- mapontosevenths 5mo ago
  Elon publicaly claimed he had never corresponded with Epstein. that was a lie. When the documents were released they found several like thie one below. Saying things like "What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?" [0] The "our" part is especially interesting as it implies he didnt just visit, but had an ownership stake. Other emails were found with Epstein making excuses to avoid having Musk visit, and Musks own child publically stated that the emails were authentic and aligned with her memory of the events. [1] [0] https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01762434.pdf https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01762... [1] https://www.threads.com/@vivllainous/post/DUMBh2Vkk8D?xmt=AQF0thOrQWJSowSvUQ4S-gE8dZlud7TNIx7hFfil6Sn9HQ https://www.threads.com/@vivllainous/post/DUMBh2Vkk8D?xmt=AQ...
  - user34283 5mo ago
    My searches have not turned up a result showing that Musk "claimed he had never corresponded with Epstein". Can you source this? If not, can you explain why you did not check it before you posted the inaccurate claim?
    - mikeyouse 5mo ago
      At minimum Musk repeatedly claimed that Epstein was the one reaching out trying to get Musk to visit his island, when in reality Musk was the one initiating and asking which nights would be the wildest parties. And after making plans to visit with his then-wife, when Epstein warned him that the ratio of women-to-men might upset Musk’s wife, Musk told Epstein it wouldn’t be a problem. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk-epstein-files-island-visits https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk... Musk has a long history of accusations (see the “I’ll buy you a horse” SpaceX lawsuit) as well as having fathered numerous children with women ~25 years younger than himself so not sure why you’d want to die on this particular hill.
      - user34283 5mo ago
        I never heard about the horse related thing, that’s interesting, thanks. A long history? Another search tells me that apart from the mentioned accusation, there is only one WSJ article alleging sexual conduct with SpaceX employees. You asked why I take Musk‘s side in these discussions; it’s because I don’t think he’s a pedophile. Nothing I‘ve seen seemed convincing to me, and the arguments made online often were so laughably inaccurate and exaggerated as to border on blatant slander.
        mikeyouse 5mo ago
        Yeah I don’t think he’s a pedophile either.. but I do think he’s okay with consorting with a known one because it would provide him access to young women. His history of dating and impregnating young women is well known and while not illegal is pretty gross imo. The flight attendant is only one of many accusations at SpaceX… https://www.imdb.com/news/ni64641805/ https://www.imdb.com/news/ni64641805/
        user34283 5mo ago
        I don’t think that makes much sense, surely as a billionaire you don’t need to consort with Epstein to meet women around 25 years old. That link seems to report on the same single WSJ article that mostly alleges workplace power-balance issues, referencing unnamed women, none of whom have come forward to publicly accuse Musk of misconduct. It‘s also fairly thin imo. Maybe Musk‘s conduct is more gross than I believe, but at this time I‘ll not jump to conclusions.
  - jdiff 5mo ago
    The =s that are scattered throughout the files are characters that have been replaced due to improper parsing. Wherever you see a =, it has taken the place of another character. The best interpretation of the string "=our" is "your".
    - mapontosevenths 5mo ago
      Thanks for clarifying. Thats helpful.

2ndorderthought 5mo ago

[flagged]

mapontosevenths 5mo ago
Elon publicaly claimed he had never corresponded with Epstein. that was a lie. When the documents were released they found several like thie one below. Saying things like "What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?" [0] The "our" part is especially interesting as it implies he didnt just visit, but had an ownership stake. Other emails were found with Epstein making excuses to avoid having Musk visit, and Musks own child publically stated that the emails were authentic and aligned with her memory of the events. [1] [0] https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01762434.pdf https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01762... [1] https://www.threads.com/@vivllainous/post/DUMBh2Vkk8D?xmt=AQF0thOrQWJSowSvUQ4S-gE8dZlud7TNIx7hFfil6Sn9HQ https://www.threads.com/@vivllainous/post/DUMBh2Vkk8D?xmt=AQ...
- user34283 5mo ago
  My searches have not turned up a result showing that Musk "claimed he had never corresponded with Epstein". Can you source this? If not, can you explain why you did not check it before you posted the inaccurate claim?
  - mikeyouse 5mo ago
    At minimum Musk repeatedly claimed that Epstein was the one reaching out trying to get Musk to visit his island, when in reality Musk was the one initiating and asking which nights would be the wildest parties. And after making plans to visit with his then-wife, when Epstein warned him that the ratio of women-to-men might upset Musk’s wife, Musk told Epstein it wouldn’t be a problem. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk-epstein-files-island-visits https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk... Musk has a long history of accusations (see the “I’ll buy you a horse” SpaceX lawsuit) as well as having fathered numerous children with women ~25 years younger than himself so not sure why you’d want to die on this particular hill.
    - user34283 5mo ago
      I never heard about the horse related thing, that’s interesting, thanks. A long history? Another search tells me that apart from the mentioned accusation, there is only one WSJ article alleging sexual conduct with SpaceX employees. You asked why I take Musk‘s side in these discussions; it’s because I don’t think he’s a pedophile. Nothing I‘ve seen seemed convincing to me, and the arguments made online often were so laughably inaccurate and exaggerated as to border on blatant slander.
      - mikeyouse 5mo ago
        Yeah I don’t think he’s a pedophile either.. but I do think he’s okay with consorting with a known one because it would provide him access to young women. His history of dating and impregnating young women is well known and while not illegal is pretty gross imo. The flight attendant is only one of many accusations at SpaceX… https://www.imdb.com/news/ni64641805/ https://www.imdb.com/news/ni64641805/
        user34283 5mo ago
        I don’t think that makes much sense, surely as a billionaire you don’t need to consort with Epstein to meet women around 25 years old. That link seems to report on the same single WSJ article that mostly alleges workplace power-balance issues, referencing unnamed women, none of whom have come forward to publicly accuse Musk of misconduct. It‘s also fairly thin imo. Maybe Musk‘s conduct is more gross than I believe, but at this time I‘ll not jump to conclusions.
- jdiff 5mo ago
  The =s that are scattered throughout the files are characters that have been replaced due to improper parsing. Wherever you see a =, it has taken the place of another character. The best interpretation of the string "=our" is "your".
  - mapontosevenths 5mo ago
    Thanks for clarifying. Thats helpful.