4 ms·
This puts Sonnet 4.6 above Opus 4.6 in the coding index.. kinda hard to trust those numbers. (Also it puts Opus 4.7 universally above Opus 4.6, and I may be wr
by nextaccountic 6mo ago
This puts Sonnet 4.6 above Opus 4.6 in the coding index.. kinda hard to trust those numbers.
(Also it puts Opus 4.7 universally above Opus 4.6, and I may be wrong but this doesn't seem to match the experience of most/many/some people. I think it's widely recognized that Anthropic is severely lacking compute and Opus 4.7 is a costs saving measure)
- manmal 6mo agoAnthropic themselves have (had?) this thing where Opus is used for planning and Sonnet for coding.
- nextaccountic 6mo agoI thought this was a costs saving measure: we plan with the frontier model / SOTA, then code with something cheaper. But then, Anthropic employees don't have rate limits, right?
- conception 6mo agoWhat I’ve usually seen is 4.7 -> 4.5 -> 4.6 in terms of quality. Though 4.7 seems to hallucinate more than before.
- nextaccountic 6mo agoDo you mean, 4.7 is better than 4.5 which is better than 4.6?
- conception 6mo agoYes. If 4.5 had auto mode and fast mode I’d probably still use it a lot.