3 ms·
This would be a violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act of 1975 which requires they show the work done directly caused the failure. If this were a widespre
by porknubbins 5mo ago
This would be a violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act of 1975 which requires they show the work done directly caused the failure.
If this were a widespread policy I bet class action lawyers would be all over it without you having to pay for it.
- Barbing 5mo agoMaybe they researched customers’ backgrounds and only screwed the ones they thought wouldn’t lawyer up
- freeopinion 5mo agoThis doesn't require research. Just reject by default and concede if a lawyer shows up. It doesn't cost any money to have a default denial policy and saves millions.
- franktankbank 5mo agoSame case goes to the same court too many times and you are gonna raise eyebrows.
- m463 5mo agoworks for health care providers. deny then let the survivors sue.
- rtkwe 5mo agoThey broadly decline it for BS reasons betting that most people don't know it's illegal and/or won't try to force them to follow the law.