3 ms·
Looks like a complicated and expensive way to avoid running copper. "Up to 1Gbps" is not confidence inspiring, if you really can't put holes in your walls I'd t
by hamdingers 5mo ago
Looks like a complicated and expensive way to avoid running copper. "Up to 1Gbps" is not confidence inspiring, if you really can't put holes in your walls I'd try a powerline kit first for 1/5th the price
- nl 5mo agoThis is the YT video I saw about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2FbzCyiNr4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2FbzCyiNr4 He used different transceivers and got 10Gbs
- hamdingers 5mo agoThat is an ad, I'm not surprised he had good results.
- Galanwe 5mo agoI used powerline before. From my experience its really bad, unstable, slow. What did work pretty well though is MoCa, basically reusing coax/antenna cabling. I get a pretty stable connection roughly equivalent to 2.5G.
- hamdingers 5mo agoIt depends on the topology of your circuits. If you can get both adapters on the same circuit that is ideal, same phase is often okay at reduced speed. Different phases or having other complicated stuff in the way like subpanels is probably what you were dealing with. MoCa is fine, but if the coax was retrofit replacing it with proper ethernet cable isn't too hard.