2 ms·
On some level it would make sense for LLMs to be inherently good at stylometry, but apparently no model before Opus 4.7 could do this. And the one stylometric t
by _--__--__ 5mo ago
On some level it would make sense for LLMs to be inherently good at stylometry, but apparently no model before Opus 4.7 could do this. And the one stylometric task that has been tried over and over with little reliability (here's some text, is this LLM generated?) is much simpler than identifying a specific blogger or a member of a small discord community. Not sure what to make of this.
- post-it 5mo ago> is much simpler than identifying a specific blogger or a member of a small discord community Is it? I would think that identifying text written by a specific person is going to be significantly easier than identifying text distilled from the words of almost everyone alive.
- hashmap 5mo agoMuch easier. > easier than identifying text distilled from the words of almost everyone alive. Well, there's more than that going on. AI generated text encodes a high-dimension navigational trajectory that guides the model through its geometry smoothly, like a trail of breadcrumbs. Human speech doesn't do that, it's jagged and jumps around the manifold, and probably doesn't even land on the manifold a lot of the time, and models can recognize the difference pretty quick.
- christina97 5mo agoIf it’s so easy then why don’t we have a high quality classifier?
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]