4 ms·
It was down to the fact that I couldn't accrue future staff costs towards the event. Yes, I would've had much more power if their was multiple interested buyers
by ryancarson 14y ago
It was down to the fact that I couldn't accrue future staff costs towards the event. Yes, I would've had much more power if their was multiple interested buyers but it wouldn't have changed this very real accounting problem.
Essentially, I hadn't optimized the BS pre-sale (>1 year in advance) as I should've.
- jpdoctor 14y ago> It was down to the fact that I couldn't accrue future staff costs towards the event. You lost me: Unaccrued staff costs are quite different than unrecognized revenue, which is what you originally mentioned. In fact, such costs would be on the liability side, so a sensible buyer would love to see you put them on the balance sheet since it would lower the assets in the company. (Buyers are always trying to accrue costs in advance, sellers are trying to accrue revenue in advance.) I'm obviously not getting what you're saying.
- ganz 14y agoThe only plausible interpretation I see is that the event had costs that were counted as liabilities, but that the revenue from the event was not yet recognized as assets.
- btilly 14y agoYou describe perfectly what I understood him to be saying, then say you don't understand. As you said, a sensible buyer would love to see those costs on the balance sheet since it would lower assets in the company. Which is exactly what happened, and the buyer spent $150K less. However the OP was the seller, and so was significantly less delighted to find at the last minute that $150K less money than expected would be received.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]