3 ms·
No? It's like saying that its safe to have more zoos with tigers because tigers pretty much never get out of their cages and get a to kill people unless there i
by pqtyw 6mo ago
No? It's like saying that its safe to have more zoos with tigers because tigers pretty much never get out of their cages and get a to kill people unless there is some massive fuckup (i.e. you let soviet engineers supervise your tiger)
- peterfirefly 6mo agoAfter genetically engineering a super tiger and keeping it hungry.
- Kon5ole 6mo ago>No? It's like saying that its safe to have more zoos with tigers No, then the original statement would have to have been "we should keep paying big bills so we can have safe nuclear", but it wasn't. To be more direct, using statistics about incidents to claim something is safe a fallacy. Something extremely dangerous that is kept safe through effort and expense won't appear in the stats until you remove the effort and expense.