4 ms·
Sounds plausible. We could also toss vibe coded mess on top of this and probably get closer to the truth.
by intended 6mo ago
Sounds plausible.
We could also toss vibe coded mess on top of this and probably get closer to the truth.
- swiftcoder 6mo agoThe article itself is ambiguous on this point: "At the time of the publication, Meta admitted subcontracted workers might sometimes review content filmed on its smart glasses when people shared it with Meta AI." That could be moderation, or it could be labelling new examples for training/validation
- intended 6mo agoThis feels like an instance of weasel words. One can scarcely imagine any reason to do content moderation over people’s own private and personally consumed data.