4 ms·
That seems reasonable though. The FBI isn’t interested in busting one perv in a closet, they want the ones making the stuff.
by devilbunny 5mo ago
That seems reasonable though. The FBI isn’t interested in busting one perv in a closet, they want the ones making the stuff.
- nozzlegear 5mo agoThe FBI is interested in busting perverts in closets. That's often how they work their way up the "supply chain" when it comes to CSAM. Consumers lead them to distributors, who lead them to producers.
- devilbunny 5mo agoA fair point. But it still seems reasonable that only about 1% of suspect posts lead to a formal inquiry. Doesn’t mean they aren’t taking the report into account. You have to figure that they already have leads on most of them.
- devmor 5mo agoDo we have to figure that? Do we really have to give the benefit of the doubt to the agency that was literally running one of the largest CSAM distribution outlets in the world for years as a honeypot?
- devilbunny 5mo agoIf you want ro argue that the FBI is a fundamentally flawed agency that on balance is a net negative, I won’t fight you that hard. But during the civil rights struggle, they were the only force that could be trusted at all. Of course, that was 60 years ago.
- rkomorn 5mo agoWasn't the FBI doing some pretty questionable stuff with regards to MLK during said civil rights movement? Eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO I guess "other forces were worse" can certainly be true, but then how low are we holding the bar?
- devilbunny 5mo agoAs I said just above, I am not a fan. They are nor completely evil, though.
- devmor 5mo agoYes, that was 60 years ago. No one involved at that time is still there - and in fact, most of them have passed. I don't know why you think there's a shred of relevance there.
- devilbunny 5mo agoIf I didn’t mention it, someone would complain that I was ignoring the one time they were on the side of the angels.