3 ms·
The more I sit with this the more this seems like a rationalization. Being a good contributor is a human quality, not a quality of the tools that you use. Are
by doug_durham 6mo ago
The more I sit with this the more this seems like a rationalization. Being a good contributor is a human quality, not a quality of the tools that you use. Are you thoughtful? Do you place the needs of the project above your own? Are you easy to work with. None of these things have anything to do with the tools you use. Perhaps they have a bias where they think that LLM use indicates poor character? Good luck to the project. We will see where this lead them.
- krupan 6mo agoIf it's possible to be that good of a contributor while using LLM coding tools then people won't notice you are using an LLM
- thunderfork 6mo agoIn practice, I think these things correlate more than you think they correlate. I don't think it's "poor character", though, so much as "willing to develop the deep mental model required for effective contribution".