4 ms·
> People have a right to record in public I do not want to live in such a dystopian country. No this right shouldn't exist and I'm glad it doesn't in my count
by 1718627440 6mo ago
> People have a right to record in public
I do not want to live in such a dystopian country. No this right shouldn't exist and I'm glad it doesn't in my country.
> If none of this makes sense to you, wait till standalone cameras become much smaller to where they become a smartbutton -- what will you do then?
Why are you against killing? Wait till you don't need to hit them but can accelerate metal pieces at them -- what will you do then?
> Any American who has any opposition to public recording is fighting the First Amendment and doesn't even deserve to be an American.
Anyone who is against X deserves not to be protected by law. "First they came for the communists..."
- randallsquared 6mo ago> No this right shouldn't exist and I'm glad it doesn't in my country. Smartphones are illegal in your country? I am skeptical. The right to record is the right to remember.
- 1718627440 6mo agoRecording people without consent is illegal.
- evenhash 6mo agoThat seems backwards to me. In your country, if you were to record someone committing a crime against you in public, you’re the one who will go to jail? Is the law applied equally, so that businesses, police officers, and government agencies are also not allowed to record in public?