> A lack of adoption isn't apriori a good argument against an interface I mean it kind of is (perhaps not a priori, but why is that relavent?). If something is

> A lack of adoption isn't apriori a good argument against an interface I mean it kind of is (perhaps not a priori, but why is that relavent?). If something is not being used, its not meeting needs, so its just increasing attack surfaces without benefit.