2 ms·
> A typical E. coli cell, after all, measures about one micrometer across. Bit nitpicky here but ... he wrote a typical E. coli cell. Naturally bacteria have
by shevy-java 5mo ago
> A typical E. coli cell, after all, measures about one micrometer across.
Bit nitpicky here but ... he wrote a typical E. coli cell.
Naturally bacteria have different size ranges, depending on many factors -
nutrients, temperature, genome and so forth; e. g. look at how huge Thiomargarita namibiensis is.
But the 1 µm as average here given for E. coli, is
not correct:
https://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?id=117344&ver=3&trm=&org= https://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?id=117344&...
Length 1.78±0.54 μm
So while +/- at the lower end may be 1.24 µm, the max range here would be
2.42 µm, which is what I had more in mind (e. g. roughly about 2µm). I don't
have all of the data to be able to say which is the exact value, but I think
the website at bionumbers.hms.harvard.ed is more realistic, so I would say
that E. coli's best average is more at 2µm than 1µm.
- jszymborski 5mo agoPerhaps an order of magnitude approximation, in true physics tradition :P
- mncharity 5mo agoA micrograph.[1] Usual EM prep caveats: surface appearance is all artifact, ~10% shrinkage. [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:E._coli_Bacteria_(7316101966).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:E._coli_Bacteria_(73...