2 ms·

IMHO giving many details in the prompt and asking the model to "fill in the blanks" feels a little like cheating in the same way as embedding the dictionary in

• palmotea 6mo ago
  It's not cheating, it seems like a technique to defeat obfuscation to show the content is there in a complete or near-complete form, which proves it was copied.
  • mock-possum 6mo ago
    What good is a technique to defeat obfuscation, if it requires you to already have the information deobfuscated?
    • palmotea 6mo ago
      > What good is a technique to defeat obfuscation, if it requires you to already have the information deobfuscated? You misunderstand the goal, which is to prove that an unlicensed copy is stored in the system. It's like a scenario where Alice sent another Bob some highly illegal data that's a crime to possess, and encrypted it with Bob's public key. The police got a warrant and have access to Bob's email but not his secret key. They can prove he has the data (and convict him) if they have a copy, encrypt it again with his public key, and compare the files and find them to be identical. Could they have gotten the unencrypted from Bob's email? No, but they didn't have to.
      • red75prime 6mo ago
        No need for analogies. They use GPT-4o to generate summaries from verbatim quotes. Then those summaries (which are comparable in length to the verbatim quotes) are used to generate hundreds of passages in the style of an author and they use verbatim quotes to find exact matches. They don't control whether this procedure introduces an information leak that makes exact generation more likely.