5 ms·
> Please do not use anthropology or any derivative of the word to refer to non-human constructs So you, for one, do not welcome our new robot overlords? A rat
by ninjagoo 6mo ago
> Please do not use anthropology or any derivative of the word to refer to non-human constructs
So you, for one, do not welcome our new robot overlords?
A rather risky position to adopt in public, innit ;-)
- xerox13ster 6mo agoI’ve already had my Roko’s basilisk existential breakdown a decade ago, so I don’t really care one way or the other. I just wanna point out that I only called them non-human and I am asking for a precision of language.
- ninjagoo 6mo ago> am asking for a precision of language. “The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse wh***. We don’t just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.”* --James D. Nicoll * Does not generally apply to scientific papers
- xerox13ster 6mo agoPrecision of ideas isn't purity of language.
- ninjagoo 6mo ago> Precision of ideas isn't purity of language That's fair. Was trying to be funny, so glossed over the difference. Leaving my post above unedited/undeleted as a testament to your precision, and evidence of my folly. Onwards; more appropriate rebuttals: "English is a precision instrument assembled from spare parts during a thunderstorm." --ChatGPT “If the English language made any sense, a catastrophe would be an apostrophe with fur.” -- Doug Larson
- keybored 6mo agoSo tedious.