3 ms·
How is mass immigration's tendency to dramatically change the existing culture not axiomatic? It's like I said, "Please dont' pour that quart of water into my
by crusso 14y ago
How is mass immigration's tendency to dramatically change the existing culture not axiomatic?
It's like I said, "Please dont' pour that quart of water into my soup, it will ruin the taste." ... and you asked for a citation.
- KaoruAoiShiho 14y agoBecause people, unlike water, can assimilate. On large scales, this is more common than threatening cultural change.
- geebee 14y agoInteresting observation, but do you see the irony in your claim considering that you wrote "citation needed" earlier? I actually don't think a "citation" is what is needed in either case, though it would probably be a good idea to provide a little more discussion of a potentially controversial statement.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- eli_gottlieb 14y agoQuite the opposite way around. Immigrants who form a small minority in their destination society assimilate within one generation, or even one decade if they're lucky. Immigrants who arrive in or into massive waves or blocs tend to form semi-self-sufficient sub-societies within the destination country. These sub-societies have a disturbingly common tendency to become political fifth-columnists in the second generation, when a whole cohort of children grow up hearing idiotically romanticized stories about The Old Country and decide to impose its better, folksier ways on the new country by political activism.