3 ms·
That’s not a reply, it’s sarcasm by the same poster pretending to speak for the publisher as a joke.
by Revanche1367 5mo ago
That’s not a reply, it’s sarcasm by the same poster pretending to speak for the publisher as a joke.
- d0mine 5mo agoWhat part of the reply is not factually correct? (premium gold+ open access article for $50000?)
- Revanche1367 5mo agoI didn’t say it wasn’t factually correct. I assumed it was mostly correct, perhaps a bit sensationalist for comedic purposes. I found it quite funny actually. My answer above was just that it was not actually written by the Elsevier company like that user seems to have thought.