4 ms·

The Elsevier reply is infuriating. The system is broken. https://nitter.space/MushtaqBilalPhD/status/2049485871699931423#m https://nitter.space/MushtaqBilalPh

• hmartin 6mo ago
  Um......
• crest 6mo ago
  Some people look best in the warm glow of their own pyre.
• Revanche1367 6mo ago
  That’s not a reply, it’s sarcasm by the same poster pretending to speak for the publisher as a joke.
  • d0mine 6mo ago
    What part of the reply is not factually correct? (premium gold+ open access article for $50000?)
    • Revanche1367 5mo ago
      I didn’t say it wasn’t factually correct. I assumed it was mostly correct, perhaps a bit sensationalist for comedic purposes. I found it quite funny actually. My answer above was just that it was not actually written by the Elsevier company like that user seems to have thought.