4 ms·
Reddit did it, linked in, most social media really, this is all just a throwback to /~user/ paths from apache and other early webservers. I think slashdot used
by wredcoll 6mo ago
Reddit did it, linked in, most social media really, this is all just a throwback to /~user/ paths from apache and other early webservers. I think slashdot used the same convention.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- 3form 6mo agoReddit doesn't have users at top level (point 2 of the parent post). This is I think a very distinctive factor, at least at that time.
- ImPostingOnHN 6mo agoTop level would be your name is the tld. 2nd level would be yourname.com. 3rd level would be yourname.site.com, like LiveJournal and Blogspot had a long time ago. 4th level would be site.com/yourname, like Myspace had a long time ago, and Facebook had after that, and Github had after that. Once you sink all the way down to the obscure depths of 4th level, there's not much difference between site.com/yourname and site.com/whatever/yourname
- echelon 6mo agoI said "root path". Very few companies do this. Github and Twitter are some of the only ones. And they were certainly incredibly novel at the time. Back in the 90's and 2000s, URLs looked disgusting. Remember this [1] nonsense? [1] https://www.php.net/manual/en/session.idpassing.php https://www.php.net/manual/en/session.idpassing.php (see "example 1")
- ImPostingOnHN 6mo ago> I said "root path". That may be, but the user I responded to said "top level". Anyways, what looks disgusting about: yourname.livejournal.com yourname.blogspot.com myspace.com/yourname ? This was all before github, so objectively not novel by then.