> The "AI apocalypse" bit That tells you how the researchers are thinking of not only the results but the experiment as well. You may be right that the reason

> The "AI apocalypse" bit That tells you how the researchers are thinking of not only the results but the experiment as well. You may be right that the reason the models behave this way is secondary to the fact that they do, but that’s not how the researchers are asking us to look at it. They ran the experiment 300 times, it sometimes did what they thought it would, and then they framed it as if that’s all that matters.