> She's trying to say that regular people cannot filter their own machines, and thus someone else (the government) needs to do it for them. To me it also seems

> She's trying to say that regular people cannot filter their own machines, and thus someone else (the government) needs to do it for them. To me it also seems like she was trying to play devil's advocate here. But I'd say that this a a nonsensical way of arguing for filtering, because by pretending that you need to cater to arbitrarily stupid people, who apparently are completely unable to inform themselves or ask anyone for help, you could similarly make the point that everything and anything should be under strict government control. I could just as well claim that the government should be in charge of managing my finances because, how am I supposed to know how to check my balance, or make sure that I have more income than expenses? In fact, don't confuse me with technical terms like bank account, income, expenses, subtraction and stuff!