3 ms·
> Couldn't the US emigrants correspondingly change the way other countries work? Sure, people of European descent in general are like magic pixie dust: > In t
by spindritf 14y ago
> Couldn't the US emigrants correspondingly change the way other countries work?
Sure, people of European descent in general are like magic pixie dust:
> In this paper, we (1) construct a new database on the European share of the population during the early stages of colonization and (2) examine its impact on the level of economic development today. We find a remarkably strong impact of colonial European settlement on development. According to one illustrative exercise, 47 percent of average global development levels today are attributable to Europeans. One of our most surprising findings is the positive effect of even a small minority European population during the colonial period on per capita income today, contradicting traditional and recent views. There is some evidence for an institutional channel, but our findings are most consistent with human capital playing a central role in the way that colonial European settlement affects development today.[1]
but emigration from Europe/US is not really related to immigration to the Europe/US. Either could happen without the other.
[1]http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/Ross_Levine/other%20files/European_Origins.pdf http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/Ross_Levine/other%20files/Euro...
- eli_gottlieb 14y agoTraditional views my foot. Everyone always acknowledged that colonialism developed new areas. The problem was that it developed them exclusively for the benefit of the colonist.
- yummyfajitas 14y agoThe motivation behind colonialism might have been selfish, but according to the article, it still resulted in economic development benefiting everyone today. tl;dr The British may have been greedy jerks, but they still got rid of the thuggees (making the roads safe) and (mostly) ended sati. Actually it's hard to find a selfish motive for that last one.