4 ms·
I don't agree with this. Github has existed for years and one of the reasons developers trust it is that they never monetized their "archival" work yet (TBD wit
by mhi3 5mo ago
I don't agree with this. Github has existed for years and one of the reasons developers trust it is that they never monetized their "archival" work yet (TBD with all the new Copilot features).
The alternative would be many sites, each one of them with their own DMCA rules.
What would be the better alternative?
- Lammy 5mo agoWhy are you thinking in terms of “sites”? I was imagining something more like a GitTorrent.
- tomnipotent 5mo ago> something more like a GitTorrent Still dependent on centralized trackers. Same story with every useful package manager, there's always a middleman.
- Lammy 5mo agoBitTorrent has supported trackerless torrents for twenty entire years :p https://github.com/sparkslabs/kamaelia/blob/master/Sketches/RJL/bittorrent/BitTorrent/TRACKERLESS.txt https://github.com/sparkslabs/kamaelia/blob/master/Sketches/...
- tomnipotent 5mo agoTorrent doesn't magically find peers, even with DHT the torrent files have seed nodes baked in. A middelman required for both the centralized trackers and trackerless torrents.
- tardedmeme 5mo agoDHT seed nodes are optional. A torrent node that's already connected to the DHT doesn't need them. Most torrent software has some default nodes baked in, from which it can discover the whole DHT.