3 ms·

Huh? The usual pattern is that experiments belong to a user and then they graduate to having their own org iff they grow enough maintainers for that to make sen

by pxc 5mo ago

Huh? The usual pattern is that experiments belong to a user and then they graduate to having their own org iff they grow enough maintainers for that to make sense. How is that toxic or self-centered? It's just like "here's a place to do low-stakes experiments in public view". It's not particularly about ego or selfishness or whatever.

psychoslave 5mo ago
[flagged]
- estimator7292 5mo ago
  You are being a toxic asshole right now by accusing people of being sociopaths completely unprompted. Honestly, pretty sociopathic behavior right here.
  - buildsjets 5mo ago
    [flagged]
  - psychoslave 5mo ago
    [flagged]
    - JumpCrisscross 5mo ago
      > exposing You’re not exposing any new ideas. You’re just attacking.
      - psychoslave 5mo ago
        Not attacking any individual at least. Attacking in the sense of being critical of individualism as a louded ideology, and connecting technical artifacts to some form of individualism and likely outcome, yes definitely. There is no need to pretend for novelty in such a critic, indeed. Just because we don't reinvent it on the fly doesn't make the use of arithmetic worthless.
Lammy 5mo ago
“Organizations” didn't exist until GitHub was already popular and entrenched, and it got popular and entrenched by centering the person developing the code instead of the code that was being developed: https://github.blog/news-insights/introducing-organizations/ https://github.blog/news-insights/introducing-organizations/ And they weren't free until 2020: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github/faq-about-changes-to-githubs-plans https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github...
- Kwpolska 5mo ago
  2010 is pretty early as far as GitHub history goes. Organizations were free, what wasn’t free was private repositories (but that applied to personal accounts too).

3 ms·

Huh? The usual pattern is that experiments belong to a user and then they graduate to having their own org iff they grow enough maintainers for that to make sen

by pxc 5mo ago

psychoslave 5mo ago
[flagged]
- estimator7292 5mo ago
  You are being a toxic asshole right now by accusing people of being sociopaths completely unprompted. Honestly, pretty sociopathic behavior right here.
  - buildsjets 5mo ago
    [flagged]
  - psychoslave 5mo ago
    [flagged]
    - JumpCrisscross 5mo ago
      > exposing You’re not exposing any new ideas. You’re just attacking.
      - psychoslave 5mo ago
        Not attacking any individual at least. Attacking in the sense of being critical of individualism as a louded ideology, and connecting technical artifacts to some form of individualism and likely outcome, yes definitely. There is no need to pretend for novelty in such a critic, indeed. Just because we don't reinvent it on the fly doesn't make the use of arithmetic worthless.
Lammy 5mo ago
“Organizations” didn't exist until GitHub was already popular and entrenched, and it got popular and entrenched by centering the person developing the code instead of the code that was being developed: https://github.blog/news-insights/introducing-organizations/ https://github.blog/news-insights/introducing-organizations/ And they weren't free until 2020: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github/faq-about-changes-to-githubs-plans https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github...
- Kwpolska 5mo ago
  2010 is pretty early as far as GitHub history goes. Organizations were free, what wasn’t free was private repositories (but that applied to personal accounts too).