4 ms·
Hm. I read that as saying that their users are writing more code with the assistance of LLMs, thus placing more stress on their systems. I do not read it as m
by valleyer 6mo ago
Hm. I read that as saying that their users are writing more code with the assistance of LLMs, thus placing more stress on their systems. I do not read it as making any comment about their own practices.
- HDBaseT 6mo ago[dead]
- pyb 6mo agoOh you're right, I misread. They're actually blaming their customer's vibe coding on their problems. I which case I call BS
- Klathmon 6mo agoIn our internal metrics you can see a clear increase in PRs and CI runs in general that tracks with agentic coding adoption, and it's significant, so I absolutely buy that GitHub would be struggling to take the brunt of that without big changes
- jjayj 6mo agoBut GitHub's postmortems are usually related to internal rollouts rather than traffic load
- thom 6mo agoA charitable view might be that changing which fingers you're using to plug the holes in the dike is a lot harder when the volume of water on the other side is increasing exponentially.