4 ms·
> the order extended no-fly zones to ground vehicles belonging to the Department of Homeland Security. Even while the vehicles were in motion. Even if they were
by tamimio 6mo ago
> the order extended no-fly zones to ground vehicles belonging to the Department of Homeland Security. Even while the vehicles were in motion. Even if they were unmarked. And even if their routes had not been announced.
I want to know the genius who wrote this, and the mastermind who approved it.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- nkrisc 6mo agoWhoever it was knew exactly what they were doing, and it was intentional.
- crooked-v 6mo agoOr in other words: the cruelty is the point.
- lenerdenator 6mo agoSomeone who doesn't get that we're supposed to have a representative government with enumerated powers in this country. Or maybe they do get that, but find it incredibly inconvenient to their own aspirations.
- solid_fuel 6mo agoThis is exactly how corrupt, authoritarian governments have always operated.
- fluoridation 6mo agoDo no-fly zones extend indefinitely upwards? If so, can you build a no-fly wall out of cars?
- kccqzy 6mo agoThe article states 1,000 vertical feet. Obviously this is targeting small drones and not commercial aircraft or even general aviation.
- michaelt 6mo agoThe federal government doesn't need a row of cars to make a no-fly wall. As we learned in El Paso in February, if the federal government wants a no fly zone, it can just create one.
- fluoridation 6mo agoBut if the no-fly zones are arbitrarily mobile, the drivers can create a no-fly wall without intervention from the federal government.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]