5 ms·

I'm getting pretty close too, but I wouldn't switch to Codex I'd switch to one of the open agents that can use any backing LLM. My reasoning is that if I'm will

I'm getting pretty close too, but I wouldn't switch to Codex I'd switch to one of the open agents that can use any backing LLM. My reasoning is that if I'm willing to pay the cost of the small changes in usage, I might as well switch to an open source agent that I can add my own convenience features to, like remote sessions and phone-based operation.

jfkimmes 6mo ago
Codex is open source and allows any model to be configured.
- epistasis 6mo ago
  Many thanks for that info!
- bossyTeacher 6mo ago
  Why Codex when you can use something that hasn't been touched by Sam Altman? Surely, your drive to get the very best model isn't stronger than your sense of ethics?
- NamlchakKhandro 6mo ago
  Codex is not open source. And it's not even that extensible
  - milkshakes 6mo ago
    https://github.com/openai/codex https://github.com/openai/codex
  - deleted 6mo ago
    [deleted]
InvidFlower 6mo ago
For the topic of remote control, Happy seems to be working pretty well for Claude Code but is also supposed to support Codex. It's a bit rough around the edges, but nice that it is open source: https://github.com/slopus/happy https://github.com/slopus/happy