3 ms·
but harness are not a moat. They wouldnt have to subsidize their own harness massively if that was the case. Anyone can write a good harness .
by dominotw 6mo ago
but harness are not a moat. They wouldnt have to subsidize their own harness massively if that was the case. Anyone can write a good harness .
- satvikpendem 6mo agoThat's not true that anyone can write a good harness because the LLM providers have information like prompts that they can RL train off of that someone writing their own harness would not have. Therefore a good and proprietary harness is a moat.
- dominotw 6mo agothat doesnt answer why claude subsidizes their own harness and bans ppl from using subsidized inference on openclaw ect
- satvikpendem 6mo agoYes it does? They want people to be locked into the Claude Code product.
- dominotw 6mo agowhy do they have "lock" them if its clearly superior to alternatives that merely u se their api.
- satvikpendem 6mo agoBecause it's a way to make more money in the future. I feel like you're not really getting the difference between what a business does for profit and its technical decisions.
- dominotw 6mo agowell internet is rife with theories about why anthropic does it. I dont buy that you have it all figured out.