2 ms·
> That's arbitrary and quite unproductive convo to be honest. Yeah but that’s what the legal system ostensibly does. Splitting fine hairs over whether a derive
by ninkendo 6mo ago
> That's arbitrary and quite unproductive convo to be honest.
Yeah but that’s what the legal system ostensibly does. Splitting fine hairs over whether a derived work is “transformative” is something lawyers and judges have been arguing and deciding for centuries. Just because it’s hard to define a bright red line, doesn’t mean the decision is arbitrary. Courts will mull over whether a dotted quarter note on the fourth bar of a melody constitutes an independent work all day long. It seems absurd, but deciding blurry lines are what courts are built to handle.
- stvltvs 6mo agoBecause at the end of the day, someone has to own the code, so some lines have to be drawn no matter how arbitrary they seem.
- gchamonlive 6mo agoEDIT: I changed my argument completely. That makes no sense because what if you refactor your code ad infinitum using AI? You spin up a working implementation, then read through the code, catalog the changes like interface, docs, code quality and patterns and delegate to the AI to write what you would. It's 100% AI code and it's 100% human code. That distinction is what's counterproductive.