I agree. If not careful, it can come across as elitist: the notion that unions are for people who are replaceable—people that need unions. I wonder though if

I agree. If not careful, it can come across as elitist: the notion that unions are for people who are replaceable—people that need unions. I wonder though if those absolutely certain that they thrive in a meritocracy will have second thoughts if/when Corporate decides they're replaceable by AI.