3 ms·
Come on. Not that I support destroying anything, private or public, for rhetorical effect. But assaulting someone or destroying their property has an incomparab
by cataphract 5mo ago
Come on. Not that I support destroying anything, private or public, for rhetorical effect. But assaulting someone or destroying their property has an incomparably larger impact on that individual than destroying a vehicle that won't even show up in Google's balance sheet.
- joe_mamba 5mo ago>an incomparably larger impact on that individual than destroying a vehicle that won't even show up in Google's balance sheet. Same re*arded argument people use to justify shoplifting. Now tell me genius, what happens to the shops in areas with high crime?
- cataphract 5mo agoI didn't justify anything. Just pointed out the false equivalence. We could also argue about the effect of systemic shoplifting, but that is also neither here nor there.