4 ms·
By that example, PostgreSQL itself is a form of intelligence relative to a physical filing system. It doesn't seem like your working definition of intelligence
by quirkot 5mo ago
By that example, PostgreSQL itself is a form of intelligence relative to a physical filing system. It doesn't seem like your working definition of intelligence has a large overlap with a layman's conception of the word.
- filleduchaos 5mo agoPlus by that example, computers have always been intelligent considering that they were created to, well, compute things several orders of magnitude faster than even the smartest human can do by hand.
- rishabhaiover 5mo agoYou do realize that you need a human, a "SWE", to do the task that I just described? A computer can't do it.
- teiferer 5mo agoYou had a human to prompt the LLM to do the RCA, didn't you?
- rishabhaiover 5mo agoYour argument is not meant to tackle my core claim, it is to poke pedantic holes. What a waste of my time.
- teiferer 5mo agoThe argument I and others here are making is that what you call "intelligent" is a property that also other tools exhibit which are rarely called "intelligent". You can certainly do that, but that does not prove us wrong (and also doesn't fit what most people would consider "intelligence", as fuzzy as that concept might be).
- rishabhaiover 5mo agoI agree, thanks for clearing it up.