Wat? Firstly, everybody knows that Israel has vastly superior forces than palestine. This in itself refutes your logic. However secondly, if your country was

Wat? Firstly, everybody knows that Israel has vastly superior forces than palestine. This in itself refutes your logic. However secondly, if your country was invaded or occupied, would you surrender and convert to the invaders way of life on the basis of them communicating well that they have superior military strength? I know I wouldn't. A lot of people will side with what is right not what is more powerful and some will do so at the cost of their life. That also easily refuted you, but to add a third argument, this twitter thing means being judged morally by the world. On a moral level, showing strenght pretty much never justifies a violent act. It's quite the opposite. Does it make it okay for a thug or mobster to intimidate or tax people if they have better weapons and strength? Should a man raping a women be pardoned of his act if he showed enough strength that the woman should have complied to his desires in the first place? The type of 'morality' you are advocating here is actually not moral at all. It's the way of thugs and rapists. People behaving this way clearly make the world dysfunctional and violent. Both sides have faults in this conflict but not showing enough strength or employing enough violence is clearly not one for either sides.