3 ms·
That story is data governance. Corporate already have a data-agreement with MS, storing all their data there. Github copilot is covered by that, while a individ
by Epa095 6mo ago
That story is data governance. Corporate already have a data-agreement with MS, storing all their data there. Github copilot is covered by that, while a individual agreement with e.g. anthropic needs lawers involved.
- keriati1 6mo agoCan confirm, this is the situation.
- mekael 6mo agoIt’s precisely this, and, to be fair, it’s a rational approach given a Data Security Exhibit starts at 6 weeks and can hit 6 months to complete. That being said, I work with regulated data, so YMMV.
- formerly_proven 6mo agoMicrosoft is simply the default answer for most large corporations. Getting access to some Microsoft subscription is very easy, because of the existing framework agreements, Microsoft providing any and all compliance slopuments needed and already being pre-cleared for corporate data etc. Meanwhile trying to use another provider (e.g. Anthropic) would be a one year endeavor, minimum.
- OccamsMirror 6mo agoPlus if you're in government you have procurement to deal with. You already have an Enterprise deal with Microsoft so you don't have to go through any of that rigmarole.
- snowwrestler 6mo agoBut if the org already has an agreement with Anthropic (and many do) then why pay GitHub…
- MattDaEskimo 6mo agoExactly this. I can't count the number of enterprises with their whole stack inside of Microsoft's ecosystem. Many of these enterprises are grid-locked with the IT department and AI usage.