4 ms·
I'm surprised GitLab isn't getting more attention. Yes, its not a carbon copy, but it is close. Apples and pears instead of oranges.
by 1970-01-01 6mo ago
I'm surprised GitLab isn't getting more attention. Yes, its not a carbon copy, but it is close. Apples and pears instead of oranges.
- BoingBoomTschak 6mo agoIt's close in the sense that it's also Jabbascript SPA crap that needs a supercomputer just to (try and fail to) display a diff of a few thousands lines, you mean? We're using it at work and it sucks massively.
- ahartmetz 6mo agoI'd rather have the open core one running on my own servers (i.e. GitLab), but performance is a few orders of magnitude away from acceptable for both Git**b.
- estimator7292 6mo agoI run GitLab and its CI on a Xeon server from 2010. It's fine. It runs exactly as fast as anything else on that machine. I've also run it on a tiny AWS instance. Also fine. I don't like that the idle CPU load is high (for really inane reasons) but it performs perfectly well.